A Lie for a Lie: False Confessions and the Case for Reconsidering the Legality of Deceptive Interrogation Techniques

Journal Article | Gohara, M. S. (2005). Lie for a Lie: False Confessions and the Case for Reconsidering the Legality of Deceptive Interrogation Techniques, A. Fordham Urb. LJ, 33, 791. Read article.

Previous
Previous

Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis

Next
Next

Race, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of criminal justice